Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 May 27.
Published in final edited form as: Environ Sci Technol. 2007 Jun 15;41(12):4354–4360. doi: 10.1021/es062602+

FIGURE 3.

FIGURE 3

Comparison of GC/MS-TEQ and CALUX-TEQ for SW846 samples. TEQ was determined by GC/MS, and CALUX-TEQ was determined by XDS-CALUX as described. Solid line is the data trend line; for comparison, the dashed line represents y = x(slope = 1 and intercept = 0). Sample matrix was ash (■) or soil (△).