Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Behav Res Ther. 2010 Mar 16;48(7):588–598. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2010.03.010

Table 6.

Simple contrasts between PTSD diagnostic groups in terms of percentage of substance positive urine screens during aftercare.

Reference Group Contrast Group Raw Mean1(SD) Raw Mean2(SD) Conest SE p d
6 Months:
No PTSD diagnosis PTSD meeting full criteria .53 (.38) .72 (.33) .27 .32 .40 .31
No PTSD diagnosis PTSD, partial remission .53 (.38) .66 (.32) .10 .29 .74 .11
No PTSD diagnosis PTSD, full remission .53 (.38) .31 (.35) −.65 .26 .013* .76
No PTSD or PTSD not in full remission Improved to full remission .55 (.37) .19 (.33) −1.05 .33 <.01* 1.23
No PTSD or PTSD not in full remission Remained fully remitted .55 (.37) .47 (.36) −.16 .39 .69 .28
12 Months:
No PTSD diagnosis PTSD meeting full criteria .55 (.39) .73 (.37) −.17 .41 .68 .19
No PTSD diagnosis PTSD, partial remission .55 (.39) .75 (.33) .06 .41 .88 .07
No PTSD diagnosis PTSD, full remission .55 (.39) .31 (.37) −.74 .22 < .01* .84
No PTSD or PTSD not in full remission New diagnosis in full remission .57 (.39) .05 (.10) −1.39 .44 <.01* 1.61
No PTSD or PTSD not in full remission Improved to full remission .57 (.39) .58 (.34) −.09 .40 .83 .10
No PTSD or PTSD not in full remission Remained fully remitted .57 (.39) .19 (.29) −1.01 .30 <.01* 1.18
*

p < Bonferroni corrected α

Note. Effect sizes were derived from Rosnow, Rosenthal, & Rubin’s (2000) formula for calculating Cohen’s d (Cohen, 1988) from the t-statistic when contrasted groups are unequal in sample size.