Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Horm Behav. 2010 Mar 16;58(2):306–316. doi: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2010.03.001

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Mean mount frequency (A), intromission frequency (B) and mount latency (C) are shown. Repeated measures analyses showed significant effects of age (mount frequency: P < 0.01; intromission frequency: P < 0.001; mount latency: P < 0.05) and treatment (mount frequency: P < 0.001; intromission frequency: P < 0.001). See text for further analytical details on statistical results, which could not be plotted due to the repeated measures design, and Supplementary Table 1 for reporting of the means ± standard errors.