Skip to main content
. 2008 Sep 12;36(3):545–556. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbn115

Table 2.

Summary of Cue Values (Mean and SD) as a Function of Emotion for Acoustic Cues That Differentiated Between Emotions

Cue Happy (n = 16) Sad (n = 16) Anger (n = 16) Fear (n = 16) Disgust (n = 16) No Expression(n = 8)
Pitch cues
    F0SD (Hz, log values) 1.78 (0.27) 1.45 (0.17) 1.71 (0.18) 1.38 (0.29) 1.53 (0.20) 1.29 (0.22)
    F0M (Hz, log values) 2.42 (0.13) 2.33 (0.10) 2.37 (0.13) 2.33 (0.15) 2.26 (0.11) 2.19 (0.11)
    F0contour 1.14 (0.56) 0.59 (0.37) 1.47 (1.10) 1.62 (1.07) 0.80 (0.62) 1.05 (0.74)
Intensity cues
    VoiceintM (dB) −32.53 (5.85) −36.75 (5.21) –29.79 (5.83) –37.54 (5.51) –34.63 (5.46) –38.12 (2.40)
    VoiceintSD (dB) 7.92 (1.86) 7.77 (2.25) 9.00 (1.82) 7.82 (3.04) 7.97 (1.89) 6.99 (0.76)
Voice quality cues
HF500 0.70 (0.08) 0.61 (0.07) 0.71 (0.10) .062 (0.08) 0.63 (0.10) 0.57 (0.06)

Note: Bolded values reflect properties that are different for indicated emotion vs mean of all remaining emotions. Cues with at least one such significant difference were used in a second stage of analysis that examined contributions of specific acoustic properties to between-group performance.