Table.
State | Interventiona | Components | Year |
---|---|---|---|
Alabama | Forsyth County Cancer Screening Program | Media campaign, educational classes,b 1-on-1 sessions | 2005 |
Georgia | Forsyth County Cancer Screening Program,b Filipino American Women's Health Project | Educational classes | 2005 |
Kentucky | Forsyth County Cancer Screening Program | Media campaign, educational classes,b 1-on-1 sessions, educational games to teach exam skills, distribution of literature in the waiting room | 2004 |
Missouri | Breast Cancer Screening Among Nonadherent Women | Tailored telephone counseling, tailored print communications | 2005 |
South Carolina | Forsyth County Cancer Screening Program | Educational classes,b in-service and primary care conference training for providers | 2005 |
Tennessee | Forsyth County Cancer Screening Program | Media campaigns, educational classes,b 1-on-1 sessions, direct mail, community events, in-service and primary care conference trainings for providers, distribution of literature, 1-on-1 counseling sessions, and personalized follow-up letters for women with abnormal test results | 2005 |
Before Team Up, states reported using 47 different intervention strategies, most of which lacked evidence-based approaches. Interventions comprised community awareness, education programs, church events, lay health advisor, health fairs, and media campaigns. All the interventions selected in Team Up were shown to be efficacious in increasing screening for cervical and breast cancer or both in the original population.
Five states included educational classes with a church as either the recruitment or intervention site.