Skip to main content
. 2010 Mar 10;277(1690):1991–2000. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2009.2019

Table 4.

A comparison of the relative amounts of moa mtDNA to bacteria DNA in bone and eggshell using qPCR. (Primer sets used in this assay. Samples from Bell Hill and Hukanui are temporarily held by RNH; SPAR, Southern Pacific Archaeological Research.)

CT values
specimen ID no. excavation site moa taxon moa 12Sa bacteria 16Sb ΔC*T mean ΔCT
bone
 BH_B1 Bell Hill D. robustus 25.64 18.62 7.02 10.38
S39957 Bell Hill D. robustus 25.58 18.43 7.15 moa : bacteria 1 : 1333
 BH_B2 Bell Hill P. elephantopus 26.53 17.23 9.3
 SPAR 5 Redcliffs E. crassus 33.60 16.11 17.50
 SPAR 6 Redcliffs E. crassus 31.81 19.67 12.14
 SPAR 9 Redcliffs E. geranoides 26.50 17.31 9.19
eggshell
 PN.J21.L2 Pounawea D. robustus 28.61 26.95 1.66 3.41
 PN.H19.SP2.L1 Pounawea D. robustus 28.40 26.91 1.49 moa : bacteria 1 : 10.6
 PN.H18.L1 Pounawea D. robustus 30.53 27.51 3.02
 SPAR 12 Redcliffs D. robustus 32.54 24.50 8.04
 H7a_E20 Hukanui 7a P. mappini 28.44 23.27 5.17
 HP_E45 Hukanui Pool A. didiformis 23.82 22.74 1.08

*p < 0.003 (paired Students t-test).

bBac16sqPCR_F/Bac16sqPCR_R (present study) CT, cycle threshold.