Skip to main content
. 2010 May 12;6:57–71. doi: 10.4137/ebo.s4527

Table 2.

Congruence of phylogenetic trees inferred from consensus and supertree methods (that ignore or consider branch lengths). CI: Rohlf’s consensus information index (ranges from 0 to 1; 0 being a bush and 1 a fully resolved tree), PM: partition metric, D1: maximum agreement subtrees. Indices range from 0 to 1. MR: majority rule consensus, MRC: majority rule consensus with compatible groupings, MRP: matrix representation with parsimony, MSS: most similar supertree, SFIT: maximum splits fit, AC: average consensus, SDM: unweighted super-distance matrix, SDMw: weighted super-distance matrix.

CII Model tree 1 (MT1)
Model tree 1 (MT2)
PM D1 PM D1
Topological consensus methods Strict 0.02 0.46 0.94 0.39 0.94
MR 0.10 0.30 0.79 0.25 0.73
MRC 0.94 0.22 0.39 0.23 0.46
Adams 0.18 0.42 0.78 0.36 0.75
Topological supertree methods MRPa 0.98 0.23 0.47 0.23 0.43
MSSb 0.91 0.54 0.62 0.56 0.60
SFITc 0.53 0.24 0.51 0.22 0.50
Branch-length supertree methods AC 1.00 0.25 0.43 0.22 0.49
SDM 1.00 0.27 0.45 0.24 0.50
SDMw 1.00 0.30 0.45 0.27 0.50
a

Strict consensus of five most parsimonious trees.

b

Strict consensus of two equally optimal supertrees.

c

Strict consensus of 184 equally optimal supertrees.