Skip to main content
. 2010 Jun;185(2):549–558. doi: 10.1534/genetics.110.114066

TABLE 1.

mwh localization in the hair is regulated differently than localization at the proximal edge of wing cells

Bulk Mwh
Edge Mwh
Hair Mwh
Mutation Ratio mut/wt Bulk 32 hr na Pb Corrected % decease ratio mut/wt edge 32 hr n P Corrected % decrease P bulk vs. edge Ratio mut/wt hair 34–36 hr n P Corrected % decrease P bulk vs. hair P edge vs. hair
mwh1 0.55 (0.036) 12 <0.001 NR 0.515 (0.009) 40 <0.001 NR 0.84 0.31 (0.011) 138 <0.001 NR <0.001 <0.001
inIH56 0.66 (0.032) 11 <0.001 76 0.640 (0.012) 50 <0.001 74 0.61 0.92 (0.019) 64 <0.001 12 <0.001 <0.001
fy2 0.69 (0.058) 10 0.002 69 0.673 (0.008) 50 <0.001 67 0.33 ND
frtz2 0.70 (0.027) 11 <0.001 67 0.608 (0.025) 30 <0.001 82 0.06 0.88 (0.017) 48 <0.001 17 <0.001 <0.001
VangTBS42 0.79 (0.088) 13 <0.001 47 0.65 (012) 40 <0.001 72 <0.001 ND
fzP21 0.88 (0.085) 12 <0.001 27 0.808 (0.11) 50 <0.001 40 0.01 0.90 (0.016) 58 <0.001 14 0.38 <0.001
stanvt13 0.80 (0.095) 6 0.04 40 0.67 (0.017) 20 <0.001 68 <0.001 ND

ND, not done.

a

The number of measurements made for that sample. Note that n is much higher for edge and hair staining as multiple measurements were made for each clone, while for the bulk measurement only one measurement was made per clone.

b

P value from t-test or rank sum test (for samples that did not have equal variances).