Skip to main content
. 2010 Jun;185(2):603–609. doi: 10.1534/genetics.110.115162

TABLE 3.

Statistical models describing mutational fitness effects for 77 viable, nonbeneficial, mutations

Model Probability density functiona Parameter estimatesb Log-likelihoodc Goodness of fitd
Exponential Inline graphic λ = 8.144 (6.867;9.564) 35.11 0.957
Gamma Inline graphic α = 0.344 (0.276;0.425) 58.80 0.993
β = 0.387 (0.262;0.676)
Beta Inline graphic α = 0.315 (0.257;0.385) 58.35 0.992
β = 2.265 (1.661;3.017)
Log-normal Inline graphic μ = −2.895 (−3.848;−0.916) 60.97 0.994
σ = 3.473 (2.550;4.691)
Weibull Inline graphic λ = 0.079 (0.049;0.161) 60.32 0.994
k = 0.440 (0.358;0.530)
a

The constraint 0 ≤ −s ≤ 1 was imposed (0 < −s ≤ 1 for the Log-normal) and probability density functions were normalized accordingly.

b

Obtained by maximum likelihood, accounting for experimental error; confidence intervals correspond to an increase of one log-likelihood unit.

c

Calculated from probability densities. Since the latter can be larger than 1, the log-likelihood can be positive.

d

Squared correlation coefficient (r2) between the observed and predicted cumulative distribution functions.