TABLE 3.
Accuracy of GEBVs (ρAÂ); mean absolute difference between true and estimated values of δ, q, a, and R2; and number of MCMC rounds per hour for sampling SNP and QTL variables for the exact and two-step approaches depending on the extent of LD and heritability (SE based on 32 replicates)
| Mean absolute differencea |
No. of MCMC rounds per hrb |
||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LD | h2 | Method |
ac
|
δ, cM | q | a | R2 | SNPs | QTL |
| Low | 0.05 | Exact | 0.78* | 0.067* | 0.37* | 0.075* | 0.43* | 1577* (±32) | 1577* (±32) |
| Two-step | 0.78* | 0.073* | 0.38** | 0.076* | 0.44* | 2476** (±107) | 3538** (±107) | ||
| 0.30 | Exact | 0.80** | 0.078* | 0.36* | 0.063* | 0.45** | 1510*** (±24) | 1510*** (±24) | |
| Two-step | 0.80** | 0.068* | 0.37** | 0.074* | 0.44* | 2485** (±103) | 3553** (±96) | ||
| High | 0.05 | Exact | 0.86*** | 0.058* | 0.32*** | 0.082** | 0.55*** | 1699**** (±17) | 1699*** (±17) |
| Two-step | 0.84**** | 0.075* | 0.35**** | 0.084** | 0.52*** | 2443** (±116) | 3676**** (±88) | ||
Comparison criteria with different superscripts (*, **, ***, ****) are significantly different (P < 0.05).
The exact approach was run for 24 hr and each step of the two-step approach for 12 hr.
.
