Skip to main content
. 2010 Jun;185(2):655–670. doi: 10.1534/genetics.110.115774

TABLE 3.

Accuracy of GEBVs (ρAÂ); mean absolute difference between true and estimated values of δ, q, a, and R2; and number of MCMC rounds per hour for sampling SNP and QTL variables for the exact and two-step approaches depending on the extent of LD and heritability (SE based on 32 replicates)

Mean absolute differencea
No. of MCMC rounds per hrb
LD h2 Method Inline graphicac δ, cM q a R2 SNPs QTL
Low 0.05 Exact 0.78* 0.067* 0.37* 0.075* 0.43* 1577* (±32) 1577* (±32)
Two-step 0.78* 0.073* 0.38** 0.076* 0.44* 2476** (±107) 3538** (±107)
0.30 Exact 0.80** 0.078* 0.36* 0.063* 0.45** 1510*** (±24) 1510*** (±24)
Two-step 0.80** 0.068* 0.37** 0.074* 0.44* 2485** (±103) 3553** (±96)
High 0.05 Exact 0.86*** 0.058* 0.32*** 0.082** 0.55*** 1699**** (±17) 1699*** (±17)
Two-step 0.84**** 0.075* 0.35**** 0.084** 0.52*** 2443** (±116) 3676**** (±88)
a

Comparison criteria with different superscripts (*, **, ***, ****) are significantly different (P < 0.05).

b

The exact approach was run for 24 hr and each step of the two-step approach for 12 hr.

c

Inline graphic.