TABLE II.
Performance estimates for the nano-injector.
| Vcc | I | Ptotal | Qinj | ΔPinj | η | Additive (2.2M TMAPS) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| [V] | [µA] | [µW] | [fL/s] | [kPa] | [%] | ΔPinj [kPa] | Qinj [fL/s] | η [%] |
| 14 | 0.02 | 0.29 | 0.38 | 2.84 | 0.37×10−3 | 15.8 | 2.1 | 0.69 |
| 38 | 0.145 | 5.51 | 2.63 | 19.8 | 0.95×10−3 | 110.6 | 14.6 | 1.78 |
| 380 | 1.92 | 727 | 34.8 | 263 | 1.26×10−3 | 1462 | 194 | 2.35 |
Vcc is the total applied electrical potential, I is the resulting electrical current, Ptotal is the total power consumption, Qinj is the injection flow rate at the exit nozzle (fL/s=10−15 liters per second), Pinj is the pressure drop at the injection, and η is the efficiency of the hydrodynamic flow injection versus the electrical power consumption. The data in italics are theoretical extrapolations based on the linear scaling assumption. The pumping performances are estimated using established approaches for pump analyses29.