Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2010 Jul;94(1):22–31. doi: 10.1002/jbm.b.31620

Table 1.

Designations and descriptions dental composites examined along with experiments performed on each sample type and statistical significance of results

Designation Composite Description Experiments Performed Statistical Significance
of Results
Ag control Negative control with
1% (w/w) AgNO3 in
microhybrid composite
Used in all experiments except
kinetic measurement of bacterial
growth
No bacterial growth or
significantly less biofilm
(p=0.003) when compared to
other groups
10% ZnO-NP 10% uncoated ZnO-NPs
blended into microhybrid
Used in all experiments Significant biofilm inhibition
when compared to other
groups except Ag control
5% ZnO-NP 5% uncoated ZnO-NPs
in microhybrid
Used in all experiments Significant biofilm inhibition
when compared to
unmodified (p=0.025)
1% ZnO-NP 1% uncoated ZnO-NPs
blended into microhybrid
Used in all experiments No inhibition in bacterial
growth or in biofilm
1% polar ZnO-NP Polar ZnO-NPs blended
at 1% into microhybrid
Used in biofilm inhibition study No inhibition in bacterial
growth and biofilm, similar
to that 1% ZnO-NPs (p>0.05)
1% nonpolar
ZnO-NP
Nonpolar coated ZnO-
NPs blended at 1% into
microhybrid
Used in biofilm inhibition study No biofilm inhibition.
Instead, significantly
increased biofilm growth
unmodified Unmodified commercial
microhybrid composite
without any NPs or Ag
Used in all experiments Neither inhibition in bacterial
growth nor in biofilm
unmodified
nanofilled
Unmodified commercial
nanofilled composite
without any NPs or Ag
Used in main biofilm inhibition
study and in preliminary studies
comparing ZnO-NP to TiO2-NP
incorporation
Neither inhibition in bacterial
growth nor in biofilm
10% ZnO-NP-
nanofilled
10% (w/w) uncoated
ZnO-NPs blended into
nanofilled
Used in preliminary studies
comparing ZnO-NPs to TiO2-
NPs
Significant biofilm inhibition
when compared to nanofilled
(p=0.045), and 10% TiO2-
NP-nanofilled (p=0.021)
10% TiO2-NP-
nanofilled
10% (w/w) TiO2-NP
blended into nanofilled
Used in preliminary studies
comparing ZnO-NPs to TiO2-
NPs
No significant biofilm
inhibition when compared to
unmodified nanofilled
(p>0.05)
HHS Vulnerability Disclosure