Table 3.

The BHI scores for galactose utilization with Harbison et al. ChIP data, for comparison with Table 1

Similarity matrix	w	No. of genes	BHI (all)	BHI (bp)	BHI (mf)	BHI (cc)
fused genes	0.5	72	0.49 ± 0.01	0.42 ± 0.01	0.35 ± 0.01	0.49 ± 0.01
fused genes	1	205	0.39 ± 0.01	0.22 ± 0.01	0.19 ± 0.01	0.37 ± 0.01
fused genes	sampled	56	0.49 ± 0.01	0.40 ± 0.01	0.32 ± 0.01	0.49 ± 0.01

The Lee et al. ChIP data are used in this article to mimick the Liu et al. analysis. The results here show that the Harbison et al. data result in a greater number of fused genes, with similar overall BHI scores. Also shown are results for a run where w is sampled using a Gibbs sampler. This shows a small degradation over the w=0.5 .case.