Skip to main content
. 2010 Jun 1;26(12):i158–i167. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq210

Table 4.

Over-represented GO terms for one of the fused clusters extracted from the galactose utilization dataset (with w=0.5

GO ID Cluster P-value Count (fused) Count (Liu) GO term
4365 1 9.8 × 10−6 2/4 3/9 Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (phosphorylating) activity
16 620 1 5.0 × 10−4 2/4 3/9 Oxidoreductase activity, acting on aldehyde/oxo donors, NAD/NADP acceptor
51 287 1 1.1 × 10−3 2/4 3/9 NAD or NADH binding
6096 1 3.6 × 10−8 4/4 9/9 Glycolysis
19 320 1 3.3 × 10−7 4/4 9/9 Hexose catabolic process
46 164 1 7.4 × 10−7 4/4 9/9 Alcohol catabolic process
16 052 1 3.3 × 10−6 4/4 9/9 Carbohydrate catabolic process
6094 1 1.9 × 10−5 3/4 7/9 Gluconeogenesis
46 364 1 1.2 × 10−4 3/4 7/9 Monosaccharide biosynthetic process
19 752 1 5.7 × 10−4 4/4 8/9 Carboxylic acid metabolic process
42 180 1 6.4 × 10−4 4/4 8/9 Cellular ketone metabolic process
6082 1 6.8 × 10−4 4/4 8/9 Organic acid metabolic process
6800 1 1.2 × 10−3 2/4 3/9 Oxygen and reactive oxygen species metabolic process
1950 1 1.7 × 10−4 3/4 7/9 Plasma membrane enriched fraction
5626 1 2.1 × 10−3 3/4 7/9 Insoluble fraction
5811 1 3.3 × 10−3 2/4 3/9 Lipid particle

16 251 2 8.9 × 10−5 5/23 7/84 General RNA polymerase II transcription factor activity
30 528 2 1.6 × 10−3 6/23 26/84 Transcription regulator activity
31 202 2 1.6 × 10−3 4/23 22/84 RNA splicing factor activity, transesterification mechanism
3677 2 6.1 × 10−3 6/23 14/84 DNA binding
16 070 2 9.2 × 10−12 19/23 53/84 RNA metabolic process
10 467 2 1.1 × 10−7 22/23 78/84 Gene expression
398 2 1.5 × 10−4 6/23 24/84 Nuclear mRNA splicing via spliceosome
375 2 2.3 × 10−4 6/23 26/84 RNA splicing, via transesterification reactions
45 449 2 4.1 × 10−4 6/23 29/84 Regulation of transcription
80 090 2 7.5 × 10−4 13/23 40/84 Regulation of primary metabolic process
34 961 2 1.2 × 10−3 17/23 52/84 Cellular biopolymer biosynthetic process
9059 2 2.9 × 10−3 17/23 52/84 Macromolecule biosynthetic process
51 171 2 6.1 × 10−3 8/23 31/84 Regulation of nitrogen compound metabolic process
5634 2 2.6 × 10−8 22/23 15/84 Nucleus
32 991 2 7.9 × 10−5 18/23 24/84 Macromolecular complex
5681 2 1.3 × 10−4 5/23 19/84 Spliceosomal complex
43 227 2 3.9 × 10−4 23/23 83/84 Membrane-bounded organelle

3735 3 1.3 × 10−21 16/17 75/75 Structural constituent of ribosome
6412 3 3.4 × 10−10 13/17 49/75 Translation
43 284 3 4.4 × 10−8 17/17 75/75 Biopolymer biosynthetic process
34 645 3 1.2 × 10−7 17/17 75/75 Cellular macromolecule biosynthetic process
9058 3 4.2 × 10−6 17/17 49/75 Biosynthetic process
19 538 3 7.2 × 10−6 13/17 49/75 Protein metabolic process
34 960 3 4.8 × 10−4 17/17 75/75 Cellular biopolymer metabolic process
43 170 3 9.4 × 10−4 17/17 75/75 Macromolecule metabolic process
33 279 3 3.7 × 10−21 16/17 75/75 Ribosomal subunit
5829 3 1.1 × 10−13 16/17 74/75 Cytosol
22 627 3 3.2 × 10−11 8/17 33/75 Cytosolic small ribosomal subunit
43 232 3 8.3 × 10−10 16/17 75/75 Intracellular non-membrane-bounded organelle
22 625 3 1.1 × 10−9 8/17 41/75 Cytosolic large ribosomal subunit
32 991 3 1.5 × 10−6 16/17 75/75 Macromolecular complex
44 422 3 1.1 × 10−4 16/17 75/75 Organelle part
32 040 3 5.4 × 10−3 3/17 7/75 Small-subunit processome

51119 4 2.8 × 10−9 4/4 11/12 Sugar transmembrane transporter activity
5353 4 3.2 × 10−7 3/4 10/12 Fructose transmembrane transporter activity
15578 4 3.2 × 10−7 3/4 10/12 Mannose transmembrane transporter activity
5355 4 4.6 × 10−7 3/4 10/12 Glucose transmembrane transporter activity
22891 4 3.3 × 10−5 4/4 12/12 Substrate-specific transmembrane transporter activity
5215 4 1.2 × 10−4 4/4 12/12 Transporter activity
8645 4 1.2 × 10−9 4/4 9/12 Hexose transport
8643 4 9.7 × 10−9 4/4 11/12 Carbohydrate transport
55085 4 1.4 × 10−5 4/4 12/12 Transmembrane transport
51234 4 8.3 × 10−3 4/4 12/12 Establishment of localization
5886 4 5.0 × 10−3 3/4 11/12 Plasma membrane

Also shown is a comparison with the GO terms extracted by the Liu et al. method. There is a general trend that the fused clusters are more highly GO enriched. For example, we have highlighted in bold all the cases where a cluster from one method shows a percentage of GO enrichment (for a given term) that is at least 1.5 times higher than the other method. Note that only GO terms appearing only in both cases are shown.