Skip to main content
. 2010 Jun 2;5(6):e10924. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0010924

Table 5. Comparison of antibiotic resistance among Salmonella spp., Shigella spp., and all bacterial isolates.

Antibiotic Feb 2003-Feb 2004 Resistant Isolates# Jul 2006-Jul 2008 Resistant Isolates# p-value*
Salmonella spp.
Ampicillin 19/46 (41) 43/87 (49) 0.465
Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole 16/46 (35) 19/86 (22) 0.148
Chloramphenicol 14/25 (56) 5/82 (6) <.001
Nalidixic Acid 4/25 (16) 22/87 (25) 0.426
Shigella spp.
Ampicillin 32/74 (43) 66/80 (83) <.001
Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole 60/74 (81) 62/80 (78) 0.692
Chloramphenicol 6/16 (38) 21/79 (27) 0.378
Nalidixic Acid 0/16 (0) 8/80 (10) 0.345
All Bacterial Isolates ( Salmonella, Shigella , Campylobacter , E. coli )
Ampicillin 56/127 (44) 125/189 (66) <.001
Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole 82/127 (65) 97/187 (52) 0.028
Chloramphenicol 21/51 (41) 31/182 (17) 0.001
Nalidixic Acid 6/43 (14) 37/189 (20) 0.515

# Number (and %) of organisms resistant.

*p-values calculated using two-tailed Fisher Exact Test.

†This section includes all bacterial isolates (Salmonella spp.and Shigella spp.as well as the few isolates of Campylobacter spp. and E.coli). This summary section may be a useful guide to empiric therapy of dysentery in Southern Botswana.