Skip to main content
. 2010 Mar 3;13(2):129–150. doi: 10.1007/s10567-010-0064-1

Table 1.

Overview of the so far published experimental studies examining the threat information pathway to fear in children

Study N Age range (years) Stimulus Information Outcome Effects
Field et al. (2001) Exp 1 40 7–9 Monster doll Threat, Pos Self-reported fear Threat ↑, Pos ↓
Field et al. (2001) Exp 2 45 7–9 Monster doll Threat, Pos Self-reported fear Threat ↑, Pos −
Field et al. (2003) 135 10–13 Social situations Threat, Pos, Neu Self-reported fear Threat ↓, Pos ↑**
Field and Lawson (2003) 59 6–9 Novel animals Threat, Pos, No Self-reported fear Threat ↑, Pos ↓, No −
Negative implicit attitude Threat ↑/Pos ↓*
Avoidance behavior Threat ↑, Pos ↓, No −
Field (2006b) Exp 2 60 6–9 Novel animals Threat, Pos, No Attentional bias Threat > Pos
Field (2006b) Exp 3 127 6–9 Novel animals Threat, Pos, No Avoidance behavior Threat > Pos, No
Field (2006c) 50 7–9 Novel animals Threat, Pos, No Self-reported fear Threat ↑, Pos ↓, No −
Attentional bias Threat > Pos
Field and Schorah (2007) 26 6–9 Novel animals Threat, Pos, No Heart rate Threat > Pos, No
Field and Storksen-Coulson (2007) 51 6–8 Novel animals Threat, No Self-reported fear Threat ↑ > No ↑
Field et al. (2007) Exp 1 41 6–10 Novel animals Threat, Pos, No Self-reported fear Threat ↑, Pos ↓, No −
Field et al. (2007) Exp 2 64 6–9 Novel animals Threat, Pos, No Self-reported fear Threat ↑, Pos ↓ > No ↓
Field et al. (2008a) 117 6–8/12–13 Novel animals Threat, Pos, No Self-reported fear LT Threat ↑, Pos ↓, No −
Negative implicit attitude LT Threat ↑/Pos ↓*
Avoidance behavior Threat > Pos, No
Field and Lawson (2008) 120 7–9 Novel animals Threat, Pos, No Self-reported fear Threat ↑, Pos ↓, No −
Reasoning bias Threat > No**
Field and Price-Evans (2009) 54 6–10 Novel animals Threat, Pos, No Self-reported fear Threat ↑, Pos ↓, No −
Heart rate Threat > Pos, No
Kelly et al. (2010) 107 6–8 Novel animals Threat, No Self-reported fear Avoidance behavior Threat > No Threat > No
Lawson et al. (2007) Exp 1 118 6–8/12–13 Social situations Threat, Pos, No Self-reported fear Threat −, Pos −, No −
Lawson et al. (2007) Exp 2 80 13–13 Social situations Threat, Pos, No Self-reported fear Threat ↑, Pos −, No −
Negative implicit attitude Threat ↑/Pos ↓*
Muris et al. (2003) 285 4–12 Novel animal Threat, Pos Self-reported fear LT Threat ↑, Pos ↓
Muris et al. (2008) 159 9–13 Novel animals Disg, Clean Self-reported fear Disg ↑, Clean ↓
Muris et al. (2009a) Exp 1 151 9–14 Novel animals Disg, Clean Self-reported fear/avoidance Threat ↑ > Disg ↑
Muris et al. (2009a) Exp 2 118 9–13 Novel animal Threat, Disg, Clean Self-reported fear/avoidance Threat ↑ > Disg ↑, Clean ↓
Avoidance behavior Disg > Clean
Muris et al. (2009b) 318 9–12 Novel animal Threat, Pos, Amb, No Self-reported fear Threat > Amb > No > Pos
Reasoning bias Threat, Amb > No > Pos***

Note Exp = Experiment, Threat = Threatening information, Pos = Positive information, No = No information, Neu = Neutral information, Amb = Ambiguous information, Disg = Disgust-related information, Clean = Cleanliness-related information, LT = Long-term effects. ↑ Increase in fear on this outcome measure, ↓ Decrease in fear on this outcome measure, − No significant change in fear on this outcome measure. * The experimental tasks that were employed to test children’s negative implicit attitude do not allow differentiating between effects of threat and positive information. ** For this outcome measure multiple assessments were taken, and effects were not present for all assessments. *** General pattern as observed when combining three measures of reasoning bias