Table 3.
H. anomalus | Ψpd |
Ψmd_ |
||||
df | F | P | df | F | P | |
Habitat | 1 | 0.17 | 0.69 | 1 | 0.72 | 0.42 |
Treatment | 1 | 23.28 | <0.005 | 1 | 35.31 | <0.001 |
Habitat×Treatment | 1 | 0.01 | 0.94 | 1 | 0.2 | 0.67 |
Block (Habitat×Treatment) | 4 | 6.9 | <0.05 | 4 | 8.23 | <0.01 |
Error | 8 | 8 | ||||
H. deserticola | Ψpd |
Ψmd_ |
||||
df | F | P | df | F | P | |
Habitat | 1 | 18.08 | <0.005 | 1 | 11.4 | <.01 |
Treatment | 1 | 0.53 | 0.49 | 1 | 0.40 | 0.55 |
Habitat×Treatment | 1 | 0.1 | 0.76 | 1 | 1.72 | 0.23 |
Block (Habitat×Treatment) | 4 | 0.34 | 0.84 | 4 | 1.30 | 0.36 |
Error | 7 | 7 |
H. deserticola individuals were sampled in July and H. anomalus in August, habitat (on-dune versus off-dune) and treatments (+H2O and NO H2O)