Skip to main content
. 2010 May 19;11:94. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-11-94

Table 3.

Bivariate relationship and multivariate regression data of normal pinch strength dominant (multivariate explained variance: 67.7%) (n = 978)

Covariates Bivariate Multivariate
Correlation4 Explained variance5 Partial correlation Explained variance6 Regression coefficient Coefficient's significance
Constant - - - - -2.637 0.066
Sex1 0.597 35.7% 0.492 24.2% 2.138 <0.001
Age1 -0.389 25.1% 0.187 3.5% 0.079 <0.001
Age2 -0.441 - -0.237 5.6% -0.001 <0.001
Height1 0.614 37.7% 0.146 2.1% 0.034 <0.001
Weight1 0.482 23.8% 0.008 <0.1% 0.007 0.796
Weight2 0.470 - 0.024 0.1% 0.001 0.456
Occupation1 0.354 22.9% 0.255 6.5% 2.641 <0.001
Occupation2 0.287 - -0.230 5.3% -1.282 <0.001
Occupation3 0.265 - 0.203 4.1% 0.195 <0.001

1 linear: coefficient times variable, 2 quadratic: coefficient times variable2, 3 cubic: coefficient times variable3, 4 Correlation between pinch strength and the covariates, e.g. pinch strength with age (linear relationship), 5 Explained variance of the optimal bivariate model (maximal explained variance) of pinch strength with the covariates, e.g. pinch strength = a0 + a1age + a2age2. 6 Partial explained variance of the single regression terms within the optimal multivariate model (maximal explained variance).