Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Jun 9.
Published in final edited form as: J Toxicol Environ Health A. 2010 Jan;73(15):1003–1020. doi: 10.1080/15287390903566591

TABLE 1.

Study Population Traits, Percentage and/or Mean (SD)

Trait Dentists (n = 164) Dental assistants (n = 101)
   Caucasian 96% 83%
   Age at evaluation 48.8 (7.7) 36.0 (8.8)
   Income in $1000s 166.4 (103) 45.9 (26.0)
   BEES Vocabulary, N Corr. (n = 12) 10.6 (0.9) 8.2 (1.9)
   Reading Test for the Word Pronunciation Test (WRAT3) 52.6 (3.1) 42.0 (3.0)
   Test of Nonverbal lntelligence-3 (TONI-3) 34.4 (6.6) 28.6 (8.6)
   Highest Academic Education Score 7.0 (1.1) 4.7 (0.9)
   Snell Equivalent Right 1.55 (1.8) 1.78 (1.96)
   Number of alcohol drinks per week 4.1 (4.7) 1.7 (2.3)
   Number of fish meals per week 1.7 (0.7) 1.2 (0.7)
Medical history: % (n)
   Use prescription drugs 29% (n=48) 59% (n=60)
   Have a current physical impairment 6% (n=10) 10% (n=10)
   Kidney problems 5% (n=7) 5% (n=5)
   Antidepressant medications 5% (n=8) 11.9% (n=12)
Exposure: mean (SD)
   Urinary mercury (HgU in µg/L) 2.52 (2.22) 1.98 (1.98)
   Years exposed to mercury in dentistry 19.10 (10.37) 10.03 (7.64)
   Number of mercury amalgam restorations 16.03 (15.66) 12.34 (10.77)
   Chronic Index (Yrs*Type*# restorations/wk *Decade) 1212 (1877) 316 (429)
5-HTTLPR genotype distribution
   Homozygous common (I/I) 40% 20%
   Heterozygous (l/s) 40% 56%
   Homozygous (s/s) 20% 24%