Skip to main content
. 2010 Jul;51(7):1823–1831. doi: 10.1194/jlr.M003897

TABLE 2.

Adjusted mean (± SE) LDL-C levels for SNPs that showed significant associations with LDL-C after adjusting for multiple comparisons

Adjusted Means ± SE
Variation in LDL-C Explained by SNP
Gene Name SNP rs no. Chromosome Position (bp)* Study 1/1 1/2 2/2 Additive P-value
LDLR rs5929 19 11087800 Family 134 ± 2.3 124 ± 4.3 99 ± 14.7 4.6% 0.00033
Replication 134 ± 1.1 127 ± 2.2 128 ± 7.6 0.5% 0.004
LDLR rs6511720 19 11063306 Family 136 ± 2.2 117 ± 4.3 93 ± 13.3 4.8% 0.0014
Replication 135 ± 1.1 127 ± 2.0 124 ± 6.6 0.77% 0.0002
PCSK9 rs7517090 1 55287544 Family 138 ± 2.4 120 ± 3.4 98 ± 10.6 5.2% 0.0005
Replication 134 ± 1.2 132 ± 1.7 121 ± 5.0 0.9% 0.05
PLIN rs8030806 15 88005145 Family 128 ± 2.4 137 ± 3.8 168 ± 12.8 1.5% 0.0007
Replication 133 ± 1.1 133 ± 2.0 118 ± 7.5 1.1% 0.44
19q13.2 rs389261 19 50112183 Family 124 ± 2.8 137 ± 3.1 140 ± 6.7 3.2% 0.0013
Replication ND ND ND ND ND

1, major allele; 2, minor allele. Bold indicates significant P-value. ND, Not determined due to assay failure.

* Chromosomal position was based on the National Center for Biotechnology Information dbSNP, build 36.2.