Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Jun 9.
Published in final edited form as: J Am Board Fam Med. 2009 May–Jun;22(3):272–279. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2009.03.080153

Table 2.

Physician knowledge, attitudes and use of methods of breast cancer risk assessment strategies in last 12 months. For attitudes, the table shows the n and proportion of physicians who agree or strongly agree with the attitude statement.

Overall N (%) Discussed breast cancer risk factors Used software to calculate breast cancer risk Ordered or referred for BRCA1/2 testing
Yes N=312 (88%) No N=39 (12%) p-value Yes N=63 (18%) No N=288 (82%) p-value Yes N=168 (48%) No N=182 (57%) p-value
Mean knowledge score (SD)* 0.63 (0.24) 0.63 (0.26) 0.63 (0.22) 0.10 0.71 (0.25) 0.65 (0.26) <0.01 0.65 (0.27) 0.61 (0.26) 0.20
Many patients ask for risk information 124 (35) 121 (39) 1 (3) <0.01 17 (27) 105 (37) 0.15 65 (39) 57 (31) 0.20
Information about risk creates unnecessary anxiety for many women 48 (14) 43 (14) 5 (13) 0.39 9 (14) 39 (14) 0.98 27 (16) 21 (12) 0.21
Available methods of predicting risk are not accurate enough 46 (13) 44 (14) 2 (5) 0.09 9 (14) 37 (13) 0.53 22 (13) 24 (13) 0.99
Too time consuming to evaluate and discuss risk 37 (11) 31 (10) 6 (15) 0.20 8 (13) 29 (10) 0.70 21 (13) 15 (8) 0.17
Reluctant to use breast cancer risk assessment because a woman at low risk of breast cancer might decide not to undergo screening mammography 22 (6) 20 (6) 2 (5) 0.56 3 (5) 19 (7) 0.74 12 (7) 10 (5) 0.51
*

Mean knowledge score is the mean of the proportion of correct responses.