Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2010 May 26;19(6):1557–1568. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-09-1249

Table 5. Association between indoor tanning and risk of melanoma by possible recall and selection bias among cases and controls, Skin Health Study.

Cases Controls Crude Odds Ratio 95% CI Adjusted Odds ratio 95% CI
Observed
All Participants
 N 1167 1101
 % ever tanned indoors 62.9 51.1 1.62 (1.37, 1.92) 1.74 (1.42, 2.14)
Evaluation of recall bias

Participants who talked with their physician1
 N 21 3
 % ever tanned indoors 71.4 66.7 1.25 (0.10, 16.50) --2
Participants who did not talk with their physician
 N 130 188
 % ever tanned indoors 57.7 52.7 1.23 (0.78, 1.92) 1.72 (0.92, 3.22)
Evaluation of selection bias

Non-participants who answered brief questionnaire
 N 107 180
 % ever tanned indoors 60.8 48.3 1.62 (1.00, 3.61) --3
1

Excludes 9 cases and 3 controls who responded “don't know” or whose response was missing.

2

Not possible to estimate due to small numbers.

3

Confounders not collected on non-participants.

Adjusted for age, gender, eye color, natural hair color, skin color, freckles, moles, income, education, family history of melanoma, routine sun exposure, outdoor activity sun exposure, outdoor job exposure, mean sunscreen use, number of lifetime painful sunburns; analysis among all participants excludes additional 16 cases and 12 controls because the number of missing was too small to be included as its own category; analysis of recall bias excludes additional 2 cases and 3 controls only for the same reason.