Table 6.
Effect | Coefficient | Standard Error | df | t | p |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Intercept | 0.5798 | 0.5659 | 399 | 1.02 | 0.306 |
Age | 0.0011 | 0.0060 | 256 | 0.18 | 0.858 |
MMSE | 0.0013 | 0.0077 | 256 | 0.17 | 0.865 |
Blessed | 0.0663 | 0.0125 | 256 | 5.31 | < 0.0001 |
Education | 0.5798 | 0.5659 | 399 | 1.02 | 0.306 |
CSDD | 0.0115 | 0.0065 | 256 | 1.78 | 0.076 |
CESD | 0.0276 | 0.0042 | 256 | 6.58 | < 0.0001 |
CG gender | 0.0441 | 0.1426 | 256 | 0.31 | 0.757 |
CG age | −0.1707 | 0.1022 | 256 | −1.67 | 0.096 |
Patient gender | 0.1477 | 0.1413 | 256 | 1.04 | 0.297 |
African Americanb | 0.2799 | 0.1643 | 256 | 1.70 | 0.090c |
Hispanicb | −0.1267 | 0.1067 | 256 | −1.19 | 0.236 |
MMSE, Mini-mental State Exam; Blessed, Blessed Dementia Rating Scale; CSDD, Cornell Scale for Depression in Dementia for patients; CESD, Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale for caregivers; CG Gender, caregivers' gender coded so that a positive coefficient indicates that women caregivers were more likely to report the behavior; CG age, informant age similar to or younger than the patient, coded so that a negative coefficient indicates that younger caregivers were more likely to report the behavior; Patient gender, patient gender coded so that a positive coefficient indicates that women were more likely to display the behavior.
Test associated with these factors reflect difference from base category which was non-Hispanic whites.
Tests of differences between model-predicted average ratings showed that African Americans were rated significantly higher on this variable than were Hispanics (t(df = 256) = 2.70, p = 0.007), even though the overall effect was not statistically significant.