Skip to main content
. 2010 Jun 15;6(3):281–289.

Table 6.

Regression model for frequent nighttime awakeningsa

Effect Coefficient Standard Error df t p
    Intercept 0.5798 0.5659 399 1.02 0.306
    Age 0.0011 0.0060 256 0.18 0.858
    MMSE 0.0013 0.0077 256 0.17 0.865
    Blessed 0.0663 0.0125 256 5.31 < 0.0001
    Education 0.5798 0.5659 399 1.02 0.306
    CSDD 0.0115 0.0065 256 1.78 0.076
    CESD 0.0276 0.0042 256 6.58 < 0.0001
    CG gender 0.0441 0.1426 256 0.31 0.757
    CG age −0.1707 0.1022 256 −1.67 0.096
    Patient gender 0.1477 0.1413 256 1.04 0.297
    African Americanb 0.2799 0.1643 256 1.70 0.090c
    Hispanicb −0.1267 0.1067 256 −1.19 0.236
a

MMSE, Mini-mental State Exam; Blessed, Blessed Dementia Rating Scale; CSDD, Cornell Scale for Depression in Dementia for patients; CESD, Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale for caregivers; CG Gender, caregivers' gender coded so that a positive coefficient indicates that women caregivers were more likely to report the behavior; CG age, informant age similar to or younger than the patient, coded so that a negative coefficient indicates that younger caregivers were more likely to report the behavior; Patient gender, patient gender coded so that a positive coefficient indicates that women were more likely to display the behavior.

b

Test associated with these factors reflect difference from base category which was non-Hispanic whites.

c

Tests of differences between model-predicted average ratings showed that African Americans were rated significantly higher on this variable than were Hispanics (t(df = 256) = 2.70, p = 0.007), even though the overall effect was not statistically significant.