Skip to main content
. 2010 May 25;102(11):1555–1577. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605642

Table 2a. Primary tumour models.

Model type Examples of models Advantages Disadvantages
Chemically-induced tumours Dimethyl hydrazine – gastric cancer (Watanabe et al, 1999) Azoxymethane – colon cancer (Hirose et al, 2004) Diethylnitrosamine – heptaocellular carcinoma (Ha et al, 2001) Dimethyl benzanthracene – breast cancer (Hawariah and Stanslas, 1998) N-acetylcysteine – squamous oesophageal carcinoma (Balansky et al, 2002) Dimethylbenzanthracene/ tetradecanoyl phorbol acetate (TPA) – skin cancer (Johansen et al, 2009) Model the full spectrum of carcinogenic events Useful in chemoprevention studies Low incidence and heterogeneous tumour development Safety aspects associated with use of carcinogens – may need to house animals in isolator Long time frame for tumour development Continuous monitoring not feasible Often highly immunogenic
Radiation-induced tumours Ultraviolet light (Ahsan et al, 2005; De Fabo, 2006; El-Abaseri and Hansen, 2007) Models non-melanoma (using UVA) and melanoma (UVB) skin cancer Useful for prevention (e.g.. sunscreen) studies Requires hairless mice
Inflammation-induced tumours Helicobacter pylori-induced gastric cancer in gerbils (Zheng et al, 2004) Use of conventional rodents to facilitate the involvement of the full spectrum of immune mediators Models malignant progression and amenable for use of chemopreventive agents Limited availability of models Long time frame and variability in tumour development
Surgically-induced tumours Oesophago-gastroduodenal anastomosis model of oesophageal carcinogenesis (Chen et al, 1999) Can model malignant progression or metastatic spread High level of skill required for initiation Incidence may not be 100% Accurate quantification can be difficult unless using real-time imaging
Spontaneous tumours, sometimes with viral/genetic component T138 mice and mammary carcinoma (Wood et al, 1992; Nordsmark et al, 1996) Cotton rats and neuroendocrine gastrointestinal tumours (Martinsen et al, 2003) Eker rat model of tuberous sclerosis (Kenerson et al, 2005) Develop cancer without any intervention Conventional rodents, therefore fully immunocompetent Limited tumour types and strains Variability in the time frame of tumour development