Skip to main content
. 2010 Apr-Jun;5(2):86–91. doi: 10.4103/1817-1737.62471

Table 2.

A comparison of physiological data between patients with and without PH*

Variables PH present n = 20 PH absent n = 76 P value
FVC, L 1.6 ± 0.7 2.6 ± 0.9 <0.0001
FVC, % predicted 56.9 ± 21.3 79.5 ± 20.9 <0.0001
FEV1, L 1.4 ± 0.6 2.1 ± 0.8 <0.0001
FEV1% predicted 57.9 ± 21.5 78.2 ± 21.0 <0.0001
TLC, L 3.2 ± 1.2 4.0 ± 1.1 0.03
TLC, % predicted 67.1 ± 17.9 79.6 ± 19.2 0.031
PaO2, mmHg 62.6 ± 13.4 73.4 ± 11.9 0.002
PaCO2, mmHg 42.4 ± 8.7 36.8 ± 5.3 0.002
6MWD, m 313.2 ± 63.1 356.4 ± 71.6 0.071
Initial SpO2, % 93.0 ± 3.0 95.7 ± 2.21 0.001
Lowest SpO2, % 84.6 ± 10.6 92.1 ± 5.8 0.003
*

Data are presented as means ± SDs, unless otherwise indicated. FVC = forced vital capacity, FEV1 = forced expiratory volume in 1 s, TLC = total lung capacity, PaO2 = partial pressure of oxygen, PaCO2 = partial pressure of carbon dioxide, , SpO2 = oxygen saturation by pulse oximetry,

6MWD = 6-minute walk distance (PH present n = 13, PH absent n = 35)