Table 1.
Compd. | Kiapp at hA2AAR, μM or % inhibitiona | Solubility |
---|---|---|
1a | 0.015 | +++ |
1b | 0.010 | +++ |
2a | NT | - |
2b | NEe | +++ |
3 | NEe | ++ |
4 | < 20%e | + |
5 | < 20%e | - |
6 | < 20%e | + |
7 | < 20%e | + |
8b | < 20%e | ++(72.3 nM in DMSO)d |
9 | < 20%e | ++ |
10 | 9.8 ± 7.4% (at 1.0 μM) | +++ |
11 | 1.02 ± 0.15 | +++ |
12 | 2.2 ± 1.1% (at 1.0 μM) | +++ |
13c | 0.118 ± 0.054 | +++ (66.1 μM in DMSO)d |
a All experiments were done on HEK-293 cells stably expressing the human A2AAR. The binding affinity (n = 3-5) and was determined by using agonist radioligands [3H]CGS21680. The concentrations of the ligand complexes were measured by the concentration of the macromolecule, not the attached nucleoside. Therefore, binding Ki values calculated from the IC50 using the Cheng-Prusoff equation[37] of large conjugates are expressed as Kiapp values.
b 8, MRS5252.
c 13, MRS5303.
d In order to determine more exactly the solubility of the compounds in two cases we plotted a standard curve graph. We measured the fluorescence intensity of the underivatized QDs (2a and 2b) in DMSO at different concentrations; then, we measured the fluorescence intensity of each conjugate, 8 and 13, in DMSO to determine its maximal solubility, based on comparison to the standard curve of the chemical precursor 2a or 2b.
e NE, no effect, or less than 20% inhibition at the maximal concentration tested. This concentration was intended to be 1 μM, however in most cases this was not reached due to precipitation.
NT, not tested.