Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Jun 11.
Published in final edited form as: Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2008 Mar;65(3):329–336. doi: 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2007.47

Table 4.

HLM examining anxiety as a mediator of the relationship between co-twin's sex and disordered eating in all twins.

Model β Standard Error df t p
Step 1: Co-twin's Sex → Disordered Eating -.05 .02 526.48 -3.38 .001
Covariates
Twin Sex -.13 .02 531.72 -8.15 <.0001
Assessment Method (Laboratory vs. Home) .03 .02 406.52 1.63 .11
BMI .03 .00 536.07 7.28 <.0001
Step 2: Co-twin's Sex → Trait Anxiety -1.26 .46 563.03 -2.76 <.01
Covariates
Twin Sex -2.30 .47 562.97 -4.90 <.0001
Assessment Method (Laboratory vs. Home) .58 .66 460.05 .88 .38
BMI .13 .11 568.42 1.22 .22
Step 3a: Trait Anxiety → Disordered Eating -.03 .02 491.66 -2.15 .03
Covariates
Twin Sex -.10 .02 507.08 -6.52 <.0001
Assessment Method (Laboratory vs. Home) .02 .02 380.56 1.55 .12
BMI .02 .00 487.48 7.28 <.0001
Step 4a: Co-twin's Sex and Trait Anxiety → Disordered Eating -.03 .02 491.66 -2.15 .03
Covariates
Twin Sex -.10 .02 507.08 -6.52 <.0001
Assessment Method (Laboratory vs. Home) .02 .02 380.56 1.55 .12
BMI .02 .00 487.48 7.28 <.0001

Note: BMI = Body Mass Index; Sex variables were effect coded as 1 for males and -1 for females; Assessment Method was effect coded as 1 for home assessment and -1 for laboratory assessment.

a

Estimates for steps three and four are identical because these parameters are calculated within the same equation.