Skip to main content
. 2010 Apr 14;48(6):2205–2212. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02321-09

TABLE 2.

Essential agreement between ETdir, CLSI, and ETsd for the MICs of six antifungal agents

Species No. of strainsa Procedure Essential agreement (% of MICs within ±2 log2)b
Fluconazole (24 h/48 h) Voriconazole Posaconazole Isavuconazole Amphotericin B Caspofungin
C. albicans 81 ETdir vs CLSIc 44.4/71.6 76.6 61.7 79.1 39.5 83.9
ETdir vs ETsdd 88.9 80.2 59.3 79 83.9 86.4
ETsd vs CLSIc 72.8/69 87.7 87.7 92.6 69.1 90.1
C. glabrata 66 ETdir vs CLSIc 84.8/60.6 86.4 25.7 45.5 77.3 97
ETdir vs ETsdd 81.8 84.8 63.6 71.2 50 98.5
ETsd vs CLSIc 51.5/72.7 89.5 44.5 56.1 77.3 95.5
C. parapsilosis 62 ETdir vs CLSIc 75.8/90.3 91.9 74.2 93.5 32.3 87.1
ETdir vs ETsdd 92 93.5 87.2 92 70.9 100
ETsd vs CLSIc 46.6/85.5 96.8 77.4 95.2 64.5 88.7
C. krusei 31 ETdir vs CLSIc 10/83.9 96.8 90.3 77.4 64.5 93.5
ETdir vs ETsdd 96.8 93.6 96.8 100 96.8 100
ETsd vs CLSIc 10/71 96.8 93.5 100 67.7 87.1
C. tropicalis 17 ETdir vs CLSIc 64.8/58.8 52.9 58.8 29.4 47.1 82.4
ETdir vs ETsdd 88.2 64.7 58.8 52.9 88.2 94.1
ETsd vs CLSIc 64.7/82.3 76.5 76.5 70.6 94.1 88.2
Candida spp.e 6 ETdir vs CLSIc 66.6/66.6 66.6 50 66.7 16.7 83.3
ETdir vs ETsdd 66.6 83.3 83.3 83.3 66.6 83.3
ETsd vs CLSIc 83.3/66.6 83.3 50 66.7 66.7 100
Mixedf 4 ETdir vs CLSIc 75/75 100 100 100 25 50
ETdir vs ETsdd 50 75 50 75 100 75
ETsd vs CLSIc 75/100 100 50 50 75 100
Cryptococcus spp. 30 ETdir vs CLSIc 96.7g 100 16.7 90 50 100
ETdir vs ETsdd 96.3 90 93.3 90 36.7 96.7
ETsd vs CLSIc 90 93.3 43.3 86.7 0 96.7
Other yeastsh 31 ETdir vs CLSIc 53.9/64.5 67.7 58 74.1 67.7 87.1
ETdir vs ETsdd 70.9 64.5 62.7 64.5 58.1 90.3
ETsd vs CLSIc 64.5/83.8 74.1 64.5 74.2 64.5 87.1
Total 328 ETdir vs CLSIc 59.2/75 83.5 55.2 72.9 55.5 89.3
ETdir vs ETsdd 86.9 84.1 72.9 80.2 69.5 94.2
ETsd vs CLSIc 63/79.8 89.3 70.9 80 64.3 91.5
a

ETdir MICs for Cryptococcus isolates, 1 C. albicans isolate, 4 C. glabrata isolates, 1 C. parapsilosis isolate, 2 R. mucilaginosa isolates, and 13 S. cerevisiae isolates were read after ≥48 h of incubation due to poor fungal growth on RPMI agar plates.

b

Percentages of MICs that fell within ±2 log2 of the MICs obtained by the gold standard procedure.

c

CLSI considered the gold standard.

d

ETsd considered the gold standard.

e

Including C. dubliniensis (n = 2), K. marxianus (n = 1), and P. guilliermondii (n = 3).

f

Mixed fungemia corresponded to four episodes caused by two different species: C. albicans plus C. parapsilosis (n = 2) and C. albicans plus C. glabrata (n = 2). A bottle containing C. albicans and C. parapsilosis was excluded due to bacterial overgrowth (coagulase-negative Staphylococcus).

g

Due to the absence of growth of Cryptococcus strains, MICs of fluconazole by CLSI M27-A3 after 24 h of incubation were not obtained.

h

Including S. cerevisiae (n = 15), D. capitatus (n = 9), T. mucoides (n = 3), R. mucilaginosa (n = 2), T. inkin (n = 1), and A. adeninivorans (n = 1).