Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Cancer Causes Control. 2009 Nov;20(9):1539–1550. doi: 10.1007/s10552-009-9415-y

Table 3.

Promoter Methylation Concordance Between Paired Tissue and Circulating Samples

Reference Sample Size Genes Methylation Frequency Tissue/BloodB Coverage A Tissue/Blood Concordance
Dulaimi et al (53) Cases
(n=34)
APC
RASSF1A
DAPK
47%/29%
65%/56%
50%/35%
94%/76% 81%
Controls
(n=20)
BBD
(n=8)
All genes 0
Sharma et al (70) Cases
(IDC)
(n=36)
p16
p14
CCND2
Slit2
44%/36%
47%/36%
27%/25%
58%/58%
86%/83% 89%
Controls
(n=4)
All genes 0
Mirza et al (71) Cases
(IDC)
(n=50)
TMS1
BRCA1
ESR1
PRB
24%/24%
26%/22%
66%/48%
64%/46%
72%/64% 88%
Controls
(n=5)
All genes 0
Shukla et al (72) Cases
(IDC)
(n=20)
RASSF1A
RARβ
85%/75%
10%/0
85%/75% 79%
Hu et al (73) Cases
(IDC)
(n=36)
p16
CDH1
11%/8%
25%/20%
31%/25% 82%
A

Coverage, percentage of cases having methylation of at least one gene in the given gene panel (i.e. coverage of 100% means that all samples had methylation of at least one gene in the study’s panel); Concordance, between paired samples.

B

In all cases methylation analysis was conducted using methylation specific PCR (MSP).