Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Psychol Methods. 2009 Dec;14(4):301–322. doi: 10.1037/a0016972

Table 3.

Empirical bias (×1,000) and coverage rate (%) of 95% credible interval of Bayesian estimates of the indirect effect. N1 and N2 denote the sample size of the first-level units and second-level units, respectively. Numbers in the parentheses are coverage rates.

α = β = 0.3 α = β = 0.6


N1 σαjβj = −0.113 σαjβj = 0 σαjβj = 0.113 σαjβj = −0.113 σαjβj = 0 σαjβj = 0.113
N2 = 25
4 2 (86.1) 0 (88.8) −12 (87.1) 7 (90.6) 4 (90.9) −10 (89.7)
8 −19 (91.3) 4 (82.7) 17 (91.5) 16 (89.1) 4 (88.5) 12 (91.8)
16 −22 (90.1) −3 (91.2) 22 (92.0) 19 (89.9) 0 (93.4) 21 (94.2)
N2 = 50
4 6 (88.6) 1 (81.4) 6 (91.5) −7 (89.7) −8 (86.8) 6 (92.6)
8 −19 (90.4) −1 (88.6) 17 (91.3) −13 (91.7) −1 (93.1) 12 (94.4)
16 13 (94.0) 1 (94.4) 13 (94.0) −11 (93.0) −4 (93.4) 11 (94.5)
N2 = 100
4 −11 (93.6) 2 (85.6) 12 (93.1) −10 (90.5) −2 (90.1) 12 (94.0)
8 12 (92.3) −1 (93.7) 12 (92.3) −10 (93.6) −1 (95.5) 8 (95.8)
16 −5 (94.8) 0 (94.3) 6 (95.3) −4 (94.5) 0 (94.8) 4 (95.1)