Skip to main content
. 2008 Oct;154(Pt 10):2929–2941. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.2008/017939-0

Table 3.

Analysis of possible insertions in two sites of the IncP-9 backbone by PCR and hybridization with plasmids representing the eight best-characterized subgroups

Subgroup Plasmid phenotype* Plasmid ruvB/ruvB1ruvA orf39A/607orf175/613
Hybridization signal Presence of insertion† Hybridization signal Presence of insertion†
α R pM3 + +
β Tol pWW0 + (−) (+)
Nah NPL-1, pBS2, pBS1141, p8C, p15C, pBS1181 + +
Nah pBS1191 + +
γ Cap pBS265, pBS267 + +
δ Nah pBS216, pSN11 (+) + (−)
ε R R2 + +
R pMG18 + +
θ Tol pSVS15 + +
ŋ R pNL15 + +
ζ Nah pNL60 + (−) + (−)

*Tol, Nah and Cap, degradation of toluene/xylenes, naphthalene and caprolactam, respectively; R, antibiotic resistance.

†+ or − indicates predicted presence or absence of insertions in uncharacterized plasmids. (+) or (−) indicates known presence or absence of insertions in characterized plasmids (pWW0, δ and ζ plasmids).