Skip to main content
. 2010 Jun 15;5(6):e11123. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0011123

Table 2. Partitioning of the diversity in dispersal along the phylogeny of European butterflies: permutation tests (N = 1000 permutations).

Metric a Statistic b Hypothesis Alternative P c
Dispersal fraction S 3 = 0.417 Skewness to root 2-sided 0.076
S c = 0.307 Intra-specific conservation Less 0.092
Alpha1 S 3 = 0.578 Skewness to root 2-sided 0.583
S c = 0.570 Intra-specific conservation Less 0.628
Alpha2 S 3 = 0.319 Skewness to root 2-sided 0.014d
S c = 0.127 Intra-specific conservation Less 0.092
P5km S 3 = 0.307 Skewness to root 2-sided 0.008d
S c = 0.188 Intra-specific conservation Less 0.102
Daily moves S 3 = 0.381 Skewness to root 2-sided 0.036d
S c = 0.119 Intra-specific conservation Less 0.015
FstL S 3 = 0.450 Skewness to root 2-sided 0.055
S c = 0.277 Intra-specific conservation Less 0.008
FstR S 3 = 0.435 Skewness to root 2-sided 0.583
S c = 0.233 Intra-specific conservation Less 0.384
FstC S 3 = 0.549 Skewness to root 2-sided 0.583
S c = 0.104 Intra-specific conservation Less 0.054
a

Replicates of a dispersal measurement for a given species are treated as if they were from virtual sister-taxa descending from an artificial terminal node in enlarged trees (see methods). Metrics are as in Table 1.

b

Test S3 from Pavoine et al. [13]. Sc is the proportion of dispersal diversity attributed to within-species variability.

c

P: P-values corrected for multiple comparisons.

d

The diversity is significantly skewed towards nodes that were the most distant from tips in the original phylogeny (with 369 butterfly species considered).