Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Phys Act Health. 2010 Jan;7(1):127–135. doi: 10.1123/jpah.7.1.127

Table 2.

Comparing personal characteristics of phase I and study sampling frame members who were and were not screened for eligibility.

phase I frame,
not screened
screened study frame,
not screened
screened
N 2373 1620 18254 6451
% female 49.2 55.8*** 53.3 62.3***
average age 56.6 57.6*** 56.8 57.2***
% moderate PA 5+ days/wk 29.7(a) 23.7*** 29.7(a) 25.1***
% vigorous PA 3+ days/wk 23.0(a) 29.9*** 23.0(a) 27.3***
% active 2+ days/wk 74.8 82.7
% newly active 22.7 33.8
% full PA recovery 7.3 6.7
% partial PA recovery 0.9 1.8
% education ≥ BA 34(b) 48.9***
% employed 57(c) 68.7***
% non-Hispanic White 93(d) 93.1
% with spouse 71.4(e) 77.5***
% ≥ $50k / year income 61(f) 68.8***
***

p<.001

(a)

based on 2005 BRFSS data for Minnesota – ages 55–64. (Note: The NCHS website gives the 3d/vigorous breakout, and the “3d/vigorous OR 5d/moderate” total as 52.7% for age group 55–64. We derived the 5d/moderate proportion by subtracting the 3d/vig from the total.)

(b)

based on Census 2000 counts for Mpls/St. Paul MSA – ages 45–64.

(c)

based on Census 2000 counts for Mpls/St. Paul MSA – ages 55–69.

(d)

based on Census 2000 counts for Mpls/St. Paul MSA – ages 50–69.

(e)

based on Census 2000 counts for Mpls/St. Paul MSA – “married, spouse present” – ages 55–64.

(f)

based on Census 2000 counts for Mpls/St. Paul MSA – household income – ages 55–64.