Skip to main content
. 2010 Mar 16;298(6):E1179–E1187. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.00703.2009

Table 1.

Animal characteristics

Food Consumption
Age, wk Body Weight, g %Body Fat, g g/wk g·wk−1·g body wt−1 Fat Pad Mass, g HW/BW, mg/g
OLETF-SED
    20 614.6 ± 8.3 30.6 ± 0.9 227.2 ± 7.0 0.37 ± 0.01 26.3 ± 1.0 2.62 ± 0.05
    40 693.7 ± 38.8# 30.9 ± 4.5 302.6 ± 20.4# 0.45 ± 0.05#* 57.1 ± 8.5# 2.67 ± 0.15
OLETF-EX
    20 425.6 ± 11.7 9.4 ± 1.2 244.3 ± 9.3* 0.58 ± 0.02* 6.8 ± 1.4 3.67 ± 0.11*
    40 538.5 ± 16.8# 17.9 ± 2.0# 228.7 ± 7.4* 0.43 ± 0.01#* 15.1 ± 1.8# 3.07 ± 0.06#*
LETO-SED
    20 479.3 ± 7.5 15.4 ± 1.2 159.1 ± 1.5 0.33 ± 0.01 9.0 ± 0.6 2.92 ± 0.07
    40 555.8 ± 21.1# 21.9 ± 1.5# 167.5 ± 5.9 0.30 ± 0.01 14.3 ± 1.5# 2.70 ± 0.04

Values are means ± SE (n = 6–8). HW/BW, heart weight/body weight ratio; OLETF-SED, sedentary Otsuka Long-Evans Tokushima fatty rats; OLETF-EX, OLETF rats with access to running wheels; LETO-SED, sedentary Long-Evans Tokushima Otsuka rats.

#

Significantly different from 20-wk values within respective animal group (P < 0.01).

*

Significantly different from LETO-SED at respective age (P < 0.01).

Significantly different from OLETF-SED at respective age. Fat pad mass was the combination of omental and retroperitoneal fat pads.

HHS Vulnerability Disclosure