Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2009 Sep 2;121(1):169–175. doi: 10.1007/s10549-009-0519-6

Table 2.

ORs and 95% CI by tertiles of IGF-I concentrations*, #

1 2 3 P-trend OR cont. P-ct
All women
All women 1.00 1.26 (0.83–1.92) 1.73 (1.14–2.63) 0.009 1.59 (1.05–2.42) 0.029
(cases/controls) 64/151 78/151 102/151
By subgroups of age at sampling**
< 25 years 1.00 1.99 (0.88–4.52) 2.69 (1.23–5.91) 0.014 2.13 (1.00–4.54) 0.050
(cases/controls) 16/50 28/50 38/51
25–30 years 1.00 0.68 (0.35–1.30) 1.16 (0.65–2.08) 0.547 1.22 (0.67–2.21) 0.512
(cases/controls) 38/69 26/69 45/70
≥ 30 years 1.00 2.22 (0.93–5.28) 1.78 (0.67–4.67) 0.232 1.99 (0.74–5.35) 0.174
(cases/controls) 10/31 24/31 19/32
By median age at diagnosis**
< 45.9 years 1.00 1.18 (0.64–2.20) 1.64 (0.94–2.84) 0.072 1.98 (1.12–3.49) 0.018
(cases/controls) 31/75 37/75 53/76
≥ 45.9 years 1.00 1.17 (0.66–2.07) 1.61 (0.88–2.96) 0.122 1.22 (0.65–2.27) 0.533
(cases/controls) 35/75 39/76 49/76
By lag time period**
<15 years 1.00 1.30 (0.52–3.29) 2.46 (1.02–5.91) 0.038 2.24 (0.98–5.14) 0.057
(cases/controls) 12/34 15/34 29/34
≥15 years 1.00 1.21 (0.76–1.93) 1.52 (0.94–2.43) 0.084 1.41 (0.87–2.30) 0.163
(cases/controls) 52/116 63/118 73/117
*

Tertiles were based on the frequency distribution of controls;

#

Continuous analysis represent risk for a change in one unit of IGF-I residuals;

**

none of the heterogeneity tests reached statistical significance.