Skip to main content
. 2010 Jun 16;5(6):e10937. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0010937

Table 1. Best team performances.

Match performances Tournament performances Opponent performances
Rank Value Team Match Value Team Value Team
1 2.8 ESP 7 2.4 ESP 0.2 POR
2 2.7 ESP 30 1.7 NED 0.3 ESP
3 2.4 ESP 23 1.4 POR 0.3 SUI
4 2.3 POR 9 1.2 FRA 0.5 FRA
5 2.2 CRO 19 1.1 RUS 0.6 TUR
6 2.2 ESP 31 1.0 SUI 0.6 CRO
7 2.2 FRA 14 1.0 POL 0.7 AUT
8 2.2 ESP 15 0.8 ITA 1.1 ROU
9 2.0 ESP 28 0.8 CRO 1.2 NED
10 1.9 NED 21 0.6 GER 1.3 GER
11 1.8 NED 14 0.6 GRE 1.3 GRE
12 1.8 POR 25 0.5 AUT 1.3 POL
13 1.8 TUR 18 0.4 CZE 1.4 ITA
14 1.6 RUS 24 0.3 TUR 1.5 SWE
15 1.6 GER 20 0.2 SWE 1.6 CZE
16 1.6 NED 27 0.1 ROU 1.7 RUS

The ranking is in agreement with expert evaluations of the performance of the different teams. Note that all six matches played by Spain are in the top ten. The average performance of the opponents of a team provides a measure of defensive effectiveness. Note that Spain was able not only to perform very well but also to force its opponents to perform poorly, whereas Russia, for example, performed well but was unable to limit the play of its opponents.