Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Jun 17.
Published in final edited form as: Dev Psychol. 2009 Nov;45(6):1654–1668. doi: 10.1037/a0015862

Table 4.

Conditional Growth of Impulse Control, Suppression of Aggression, and Consideration of Others on Offending Trajectory Group

Effect Model 1
Model 2
Model 3
Impulse control
Suppression of aggression
Consideration of others
B SE B SE B SE
Fixed effects
Intercept 0.59** 0.09 0.54** 0.09 2.15** 0.09
 Trajectory group F(4, 6198) = 12.87** F(4, 6198) = 16.87** F(4, 6198) = 15.96**
 Impulse control 0.48** 0.01 >0.01 0.01
 Aggression suppression 0.46** 0.01 0.01 0.01
 Consideration of others >−0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01
 Future orientation 0.07** 0.02 0.01 0.02 0.36** 0.02
 Personal responsibility 0.21** 0.02 0.19** 0.02 0.08** 0.02
 RPI 0.07** 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.02 0.02
Linear slope (age) 0.03 0.01 0.02** 0.01 0.03** 0.01
 Trajectory group F(4, 6198) = 4.08** F(4, 6198) = 3.69** F(4, 6198) = 4.29**
Random effects
 Intercept 0.25** 0.01 0.26** 0.01 0.23** 0.01
 Linear slope >0.002** >0.01 0.004** >0.01 0.004** >0.01
 Level 1 error 0.29** 0.01 0.30** 0.01 0.34** 0.01
Model fit
−2 log likelihood 16,077.8 16,418.5 17,174.9
AIC 16,115.8 16,456.5 17,212.9
BIC 16,210.9 16,551.6 17,308.0

Note. Dashes indicate that term was not estimated. RPI = Resistance to Peer Influence; AIC = Akaike’s information criterion; BIC = Bayesian information criterion.

**

p < .01.