Table 1.
Comparison | Type I | Type II | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
θI | SE | θII | SE | |
PRR1/TOC1 vs PRR3 and 7 | 0.366 | 0.109* | 0.196 | 0.093** |
PRR1/TOC1 vs PRR5 and 9 | 0.473 | 0.075* | 0.175 | 0.088** |
PRR3 and 7 vs PRR5 and 9 | 0.234 | 0.048* | -0.003 | 0.106 |
*P < 0.01, **P < 0.05
Comparison | Type I | Type II | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
θI | SE | θII | SE | |
PRR1/TOC1 vs PRR3 and 7 | 0.366 | 0.109* | 0.196 | 0.093** |
PRR1/TOC1 vs PRR5 and 9 | 0.473 | 0.075* | 0.175 | 0.088** |
PRR3 and 7 vs PRR5 and 9 | 0.234 | 0.048* | -0.003 | 0.106 |
*P < 0.01, **P < 0.05