Skip to main content
. 2009 Jun;58(Pt 6):774–778. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.006171-0

Table 3.

Cephalosporin and carbapenem susceptibility and MIC data from KPC+ isolates

All isolates were K. pneumoniae and categorized as ESBL+ using the Phoenix system.

Isolate no. DD interpretation* MIC (μg ml−1)† Phenotype‡
Atm Ctt Cpd Ctx Caz Cro Fep Ipm Mem
101 R R R R R >32 >16 >8 >8 ESBL+AmpC
107 R S R S I 32 2 <=1 <=1 ESBL
117 I S R S I 32 2 8 <=1 ESBL
118 R R R R R >32 4 <=1 <=1 ESBL+AmpC
123 R S R R R >32 >16 <=1 4 ESBL+AmpC
155 R S R R R >32 >16 4 >8 ESBL+AmpC
167 R R R R R >32 >16 >8 >8 ESBL+AmpC
171 R S R I R >32 8 <=1 <=1 ESBL

*Interpretations based on zone size using CLSI criteria. S, Susceptible; I, intermediate susceptibility; R, resistant. Atm, aztreonam; Ctt, cefotetan; Cpd, cefpodoxime; Ctx, cefotaxime; Caz, ceftazidime.

†MICs were determined by the Phoenix system. Bold indicates resistance and underlining indicates intermediate susceptibility according to CLSI criteria. Cro, Ceftriaxone; Fep, cefepime; Ipm, imipenem; Mem, meropenem.

‡Phenotypes were determined by DD testing as described in the text.