Table 3.
Dependent Variable |
||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Predictor Variable | Impulsivity MFT |
EC MFT |
Approach Mother |
Approach Father |
Ext Prob MFT |
Rel Agg MF |
Rel Agg Teacher |
Resiliency MFT |
||||||||
B | SE | B | SE | B | SE | B | SE | B | SE | B | SE | B | SE | B | SE | |
Impulsivity | ||||||||||||||||
MFT | ||||||||||||||||
EC | −.49** | .04 | ||||||||||||||
MFT | (n = 415) | |||||||||||||||
Approach | .27** | .05 | −.12* | .05 | ||||||||||||
Mother | (n = 358) | (n =358) | ||||||||||||||
Approach | .28* | .05 | .00 | .06 | .06 | .07 | ||||||||||
Father | (n = 261) | (n = 261) | (n = 215) | |||||||||||||
Ext Prob | .44** | .04 | −.62** | .03 | .12** | .04 | .09 | .05 | ||||||||
MFT | (n = 414) | (n = 414) | (n = 358) | (n = 260) | ||||||||||||
Rel Agg | .20** | .04 | −.25** | .04 | .10 | .06 | .17* | .07 | .36** | .03 | ||||||
MF | (n = 402) | (n = 402) | (n = 357) | (n = 260) | (n = 402) | |||||||||||
Rel Agg | .36** | .08 | −.42** | .07 | .11 | .10 | .07 | .12 | .62** | .06 | .23* | .10 | ||||
Teacher | (n = 279) | (n = 279) | (n = 245) | (n=174) | (n = 279) | (n = 268) | ||||||||||
Resiliency | .04 | .04 | .41** | .04 | .00 | .04 | .09 | .05 | .36** | .05 | −.10** | .03 | −.30** | .07 | ||
MFT | (n = 414) | (n = 414) | (n = 358) | (n = 260) | (n = 414) | (n = 402) | (n = 279) |
p < .05
p < .01
Note: MFT = mother, father, and teacher composite; MF = mother and father composite; EC = effortful control; Ext Prob = externalizing problems;. Rel. Agg. = relational aggression. The horizontal measures were the dependent variables and the vertical measures were centered and used as the predictor in the mixed model analyses.