Table 2.
Scenario | Exposure b | 25th percentile | 50th percentile | 75th percentile | Range | Recommend PEP (% "yes")c |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Skunk (bite) | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.1 - 0.01 | 100 |
2 | Bat (unk) | 0.0001 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.01 - 0.000001 | 100 |
3 | Dog (bite) | 0.00001 | 0.00001 | 0.0001 | 0.001 - 0.00001 | 95 |
4 | Dog (lick) | 0.000001 | 0.000001 | 0.000001 | 0.00001 - 0.000001 | 10 |
5 | Cat (bite) | 0.0001 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.01 - 0.00001 | 100 |
6 | Cat (lick) | 0.000001 | 0.000001 | 0.000001 | 0.0001 - 0.000001 | 5 |
7 | Human (unk) | 0.000001 | 0.000001 | 0.000001 | 0.00001 -0.000001 | 20 |
a Study participants were asked to estimate the probability of developing rabies without rabies post-exposure prophylaxis for each indicated potential exposure scenario
b bite - superficial laceration, area not washed or cleaned; lick - over skin with recent superficial scratches, area not washed or cleaned; unk - unknown if true exposure, no obvious bites, scratches, or direct contact with bodily fluids
c Percentage of panel members recommending rabies post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) for the indicated scenario