Skip to main content
. 2010 Jul;71(4):535–538. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2010.71.535

Table 2.

Unstandardized regression estimates of program effects at 6-year follow-up (n = 413)

30-day substance use
Variable Alcohol B (SE) Heavy drinking B (SE) Cigarettes B (SE) Marijuana B (SE) Refusal skills B (SE) Peer use B (SE) Alcohol consequences B (SE)
CDP vs. CD§ −0.53 (0.54) −0.18 (0.24) −2.50** (0.82) −0.27 (0.86) 0.21 (0.20) −0.01 (0.11) −0.16 (0.13)
CDP and CD vs. control −1.31** (0.48) −0.57** (0.21) −1.68* (0.72) −0.30 (0.76) −0.38* (0.17) −0.13 (0.09) −0.26* (0.11)
Age 0.65** (0.33) 0.20* (0.09) 0.91** (0.30) 0.20 (0.31) 0.93 (0.07) 0.09 (0.04) −0.01 (0.11)
Female 0.38 (0.66) −0.29 (0.20) 0.61 (0.67) −0.76 (0.70) 0.11 (0.16) 0.19 (0.09) −0.05 (0.05)
Pretest scores 0.25 (0.63) 0.74** (0.28) −0.48 (1.27) −0.54 (1.43) 0.10 (0.09) −0.10 (0.10)

Notes: CDP = CD-ROM and parent component arm; CD = CD-ROM only arm.

§

Contrast code = 0.5, -0.5, 0.0 for conditions CDP, CD, control, respectively;

contrast code = 1.0, 1.0, 0.0 for conditions CDP, CD, control, respectively.

*

p < .05;

**

p < .01.