Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Tetrahedron Lett. 2009 Dec 16;50(50):6935–6937. doi: 10.1016/j.tetlet.2009.09.090

Table 1.

Screening conditions for reaction optimization

Entrya,d [Cu] cat. Ligand Solvent Yield (%)
1 CuI l-Proline DMSO 65
2 CuBr l-Proline DMSO 55
3 Cu2O l-Proline DMSO 10
4 CuI (CH2OH)2 DMSO 78
5 CuI 1,10-Phenanthroline DMSO 94
6 CuI DBU DMSO 50
7 CuI (CH2NHMe)2 DMSO 72
8 CuI 1,10-Phenanthroline DMF 92
9 CuI 1,10-Phenanthroline Dioxane 84
10 CuI 1,10-Phenanthroline DMF 96b
11 CuI 1,10-Phenanthroline DMF 94c
a

Reaction conditions: 1 (0.17 mmol), allylamine (0.2 mmol), CuX (0.017 mmol), ligand (0.034 mmol), Cs2CO3 (0.34 mmol) in solvent (0.5 M) at 100 °C for 6 h.

b

Microwave irradiation for 22 min at 140 °C.

c

Microwave irradiation for 11 min at 150 °C.

d

Other bases were also investigated (DBU, K2CO3, Et3N) but Cs2CO3 was preferred.