Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Comput Chem. 2010 Mar;31(4):671–690. doi: 10.1002/jcc.21367

Table 1.

Interaction energies (kcal/mol) and distances (Å) of pyrrolidine-water complexes in different geometries. HF/6–31G(d) interaction energies are scaled by a factor 1.16 (see “methodology”). HF interaction distances are not scaled; however, bulk phase hydrogen bonds should be roughly 0.2 Å shorter than vacuum. Results include Average Deviation (AD), Root Mean Square Deviation (RMSD) and Absolute Average Deviation (AAD).

interaction geom. ΔE(HF)* ΔE(CGenFF) ΔΔE r(HF) r(CGenFF) Δr
N1H…OHH −2.86 −2.67 0.19 2.31 2.00 −0.31
N1…HOH −7.55 −7.64 −0.09 2.07 1.90 −0.17
C2H…OHH −0.68 −0.62 0.06 2.84 2.76 −0.08
C2H…OHH −1.03 −0.87 0.16 2.78 2.73 −0.05
C3H…OHH −0.93 −0.90 0.03 2.84 2.78 −0.06
C3H…OHH −1.11 −0.85 0.26 2.85 2.79 −0.06
C4H…OHH −0.92 −0.92 0.00 2.85 2.77 −0.08
C4H…OHH −1.01 −0.85 0.16 2.86 2.79 −0.07
C5H…OHH −0.62 −0.62 0.00 2.85 2.76 −0.09
C5H…OHH −1.06 −0.87 0.19 2.78 2.73 −0.05

AD 0.10 −0.10
RMSD 0.14 0.13
AAD 0.12 0.10