Table 2.
Details of lead dosed goats and tibia Pb levels.
| ID# | Gender | Age (y) | # of years dosed with Pb | Cumulative Pb dose (g) | Tibia-Pb (± SEM)a (μg/g dry wt.) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| G0–11 | F | 14 | 0 | 0 | 0.7 ± 0.1 |
| G2–15 | F | 9 | 1.2 | 10.9 | 8.0 ± 0.2 |
| G2–14 | M | 8 | 3.3 | 19.7 | 12.7 ± 0.2 |
| G106 | F | 13 | 4.3 | 25.7 | 20.2 ± 0.3 |
| G2–13 | M | 9 | 4.6 | 35.5 | 31.8 ± 0.3 |
| G2–11 | M | 12 | 6.8 | 36.6 | 23.5 ± 0.3 |
| G2–8 | M | 12 | 7.8 | 40.2 | 34.4 ± 0.4 |
| G1–9 | F | 10 | 7.7 | 44.8 | 42.4 ± 0.5 |
| G2–7 | F | 12 | 8.0 | 46.8 | 34.5 ± 0.4 |
| G2–5 | M | 12 | 8.0 | 47.0 | 20.5 ± 0.3 |
| G1–5 | M | 14 | 8.5 | 53.4 | 42.0 ± 0.5 |
a
Standard Error of the Mean (SEM) represents analytical uncertainty (n=5), rather than biological variation within the tibia.