Skip to main content
. 2010 May 12;11:52. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-11-52

Table 3.

Results of meta-analyses and sensitivity analyses.

Outcome Review results Number of studies suspected of ORB Number of participants missing from the meta-analysis (%) Sensitivity analysis results

ORB alone Study publication bias *
Intravenous Magnesium: children

Hospital admission RR 0.69 (95% CI 0.53, 0.90) from 3 studies, I2 = 17.7%, RE. Favours intervention 3 [18,23,24] 117 (50%) RR 0.76 (95% CI: 0.58, 0.99) for one study as trialists confirmed that for the other two it was not measured. 1

Pulmonary function SMD 1.94 (95% CI: 0.80, 3.08) from 4 studies, I2 = 84.4%, RE. Favours intervention 2 [18,20] 104 (45%) NA: both studies given H classifications and this was confirmed by trialists 4

Intravenous Magnesium: adults

Hospital admission RR 0.87 (95% CI 0.70, 1.08) from 8 studies, I2- = 30%, RE. Favours intervention 2 [22,26] 129 (14%) NA: confirmed by trialists that this was not measured 4

Pulmonary function SMD 0.25 (95% CI -0.01, 0.51) from 9 studies, I2 = 70.6%, RE. Favours intervention 1 [19] 33 (3%) NA: results from one study obtained and included in an updated meta-analysis
Updated SMD 0.24, (95% CI 0, 0.48) from 10 studies, RE. I2 = 67% 7

Nebulised Magnesium: children

Hospital admission RR 2 (95% CI 0.19, 20.93) from 1 study, RE. Favours control 1 [25] 40 (39%) NA: confirmed by the trialists that this was not measured 1

Pulmonary function SMD -0.26 (95% CI -1.49, 0.98) from 2 studies, I2 = 88.9%, RE. Favours control 0 0 NA: all eligible studies reported on this outcome 1

Nebulised Magnesium: adults

Hospital admission RR 0.68 (95% CI 0.46, 1.02) from 6 studies, I2 = 0, RE. Favours intervention 1 [21] 74 (17%) RR 0.76 (95% CI 0.51, 1.13) 8

Pulmonary function SMD 0.17 (95% CI -0.02, 0.36) 7 studies, I squared 1.2%, RE. Favours intervention 0 0 NA: all eligible studies reported on this outcome 5

*: number of unpublished studies required to overturn review conclusions after allowing for ORB. When the result is statistically significant this implies the result becoming non-significant. When the result is not statistically significant, the reported value is the number required to change the direction of treatment effect.

NA: Not Applicable; RE: random effects