Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2010 Mar 15;21(7):504–511. doi: 10.1016/j.numecd.2009.11.012

Table 4.

Results of Cox Proportional Hazards Modeling on Risk of Recurrent CVD

Women Men

Hazard
Ratio
95% CI Hazard
Ratio
95% CI

Normoglycemia 1.00 ---- 1.00 ----
Model 1 Impaired fasting
glucose
2.14 1.15, 3.96 0.84 0.57, 1.22
Diabetes 3.23 1.81, 5.76 1.11 0.70, 1.77

P trend = <0.001 P trend = 0.567

Normoglycemia 1.00 ---- 1.00 ----
Model 2 Impaired fasting
glucose
2.24 1.20, 4.18 0.83 0.57, 1.21
Diabetes 2.96 1.65, 5.30 1.09 0.68, 1.75

P trend = <0.001 P trend = 0.836
1

Adjusted for age, current smoker (yes vs. otherwise), Ever use alcohol (yes vs. otherwise), hypertension (yes vs. otherwise), hypercholesterolemia (yes vs. otherwise), aspirin use (yes vs. otherwise), BMI (continuous)

Recurrent event defined as CHD and stroke (ICD 410–414,427,430–439), PTCA or angioplasty.