Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Psychooncology. 2010 Oct;19(10):1102–1111. doi: 10.1002/pon.1667

Table 3. Odds ratios for family communication characteristics: comparing (1) Open to closed (2) Blocked to unblocked and (3) High vs. low frequency..

(1) Open Communication
Style
(2) Blocked Communication
Style
(3) Communication Frequency

Family Functioning
Characteristics
OR 95% CI p OR 95% CI p OR 95% CI p
Active coping
 Rarely 1.00 --- --- 1.00 --- --- 1.00 --- ---
 Often 2.75 (1.69, 4.45) <0.001 0.96 (0.58, 1.60) 0.96 2.04 (1.27, 3.28) 0.003
Denial coping
 Sometimes 1.00 --- --- 1.00 --- --- 1.00 --- ---
 Never 2.39 (1.47, 3.86) <0.001 0.77 (0.46, 1.28) 0.32 1.23 (0.77, 1.97) 0.38
Adaptation
 Less 1.00 --- --- 1.00 --- --- 1.00 --- ---
 More 3.22 (1.91, 5.42) <0.001 0.84 (0.50, 1.43) 0.53 1.87 (1.15, 3.05) 0.01
Cohesion
 Low 1.00 --- --- 1.00 --- --- 1.00 --- ---
 High 0.23 (1.37, 3.62) 0.001 1.17 (0.69, 1.95) 0.56 1.84 (1.14, 2.97) 0.01
Seriousness norms
 Not serious 1.00 --- --- 1.00 --- --- 1.00 --- ---
 Serious 3.66 (1.60, 8.37) 0.002 0.79 (0.39, 1.59) 0.50 1.46 (0.73, 2.94) 0.29
Tanning norms
 Negative 1.00 --- --- 1.00 --- --- 1.00 --- ---
 Positive 0.50 (0.28, 0.91) 0.02 1.15 (0.63, 2.10) 0.64 1.23 (0.70, 2.16) 0.47

Adjusted for: age, gender, education, geographic distance to case, gender, and marital status