Skip to main content
. 2010 Apr;12(3):181–187. doi: 10.1111/j.1477-2574.2009.00141.x

Table 2.

Ultrasound characteristics of all identified lesions

Patient (age, years/sex) IOUS characteristics and impression CE-IOUS characteristics and impression
1 (73/M) 2 lesions – anechoic with no wall = cysts 2 lesions
Arterial phase: no rim enhancement Portal and delayed phase: no contrast uptake
2 (77/F) a) Hypoechoic with irregular border = equivocal a) Arterial phase: hypo-intense with peripheral rim enhancement Portal phase: rim enhancement fades Delayed phase: dark defects (‘black holes’) on background of bright parenchyma = metastasis (classical contrast appearance)
b) As patient 1 = cysts b) Cyst (as patient 1)
3 (82/F) a) Hyperechoic with irregular border = equivocal a/b) Continuous uptake of contrast, no ‘black holes’ Parenchyma bright in all 3 phases
b) Mildly hypoechoic, regular border = benign = benign
4 (61/M) 4 similar lesions Classical contrast appearance of metastases (‘black hole’) (1 lesion not visible in delayed phase)
Hypoechoic rim, hyperechoic centre (classical appearance of metastases)
5 (30/F) 2 lesions 3 lesions
a) Classical appearance = metastasis a) Classical metastasis (‘black hole’)
b) Hyperechoic with posterior enhancement b) Centripetal filling in delayed and portal phase, brighter than contrast bright parenchyma = haemangioma
c) Classical metastasis
6 (77/F) Classical appearance = metastases Classical metastases
7 (65/M) Hyperechoic with irregular border = equivocal As patient 3 = benign

IOUS, intraoperative ultrasound; CE-IOUS, contrast-enhanced intraoperative ultrasound; M, male; F, female